https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91319
--- Comment #5 from CVS Commits <cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org> --- The trunk branch has been updated by Marek Polacek <mpola...@gcc.gnu.org>: https://gcc.gnu.org/g:4a92205ef1da044eaf9490e61787836a3abe7d6c commit r14-3577-g4a92205ef1da044eaf9490e61787836a3abe7d6c Author: Marek Polacek <pola...@redhat.com> Date: Fri Aug 25 11:47:54 2023 -0400 c++: CWG 2359, wrong copy-init with designated init [PR91319] This CWG clarifies that designated initializer support direct-initialization. Just be careful what Note 2 in [dcl.init.aggr]/4.2 says: "If the initialization is by designated-initializer-clause, its form determines whether copy-initialization or direct-initialization is performed." Hence this patch sets CONSTRUCTOR_IS_DIRECT_INIT only when we are dealing with ".x{}", but not ".x = {}". PR c++/91319 gcc/cp/ChangeLog: * parser.cc (cp_parser_initializer_list): Set CONSTRUCTOR_IS_DIRECT_INIT when the designated initializer is of the .x{} form. gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog: * g++.dg/cpp2a/desig30.C: New test.
