https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111022
--- Comment #8 from john.harper at vuw dot ac.nz --- I couldn't see the program teste0es0en0.f90 that is in your bugzilla but I could see that it does have 691 bytes. So does one of the two versions that I now have in my own computer. The attachment to this email contains that version and what ifort did with it. (Of course E0.0E0 is illegal Fortran but ES0.0E0 and EN0.0E0 are OK according to both the f2018 and f2023 standards.) On Sat, 26 Aug 2023, jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu.org wrote: > Date: Sat, 26 Aug 2023 04:26:51 +0000 > From: jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu.org <gcc-bugzi...@gcc.gnu.org> > To: John Harper <john.har...@vuw.ac.nz> > Subject: [Bug libfortran/111022] ES0.0E0 format gave ES0.dE0 output with d too > high. > Resent-Date: Sat, 26 Aug 2023 16:27:07 +1200 (NZST) > Resent-From: <john.har...@vuw.ac.nz> > > https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111022 > > Jerry DeLisle <jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu.org> changed: > > What |Removed |Added > ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- > Status|NEW |ASSIGNED > > --- Comment #7 from Jerry DeLisle <jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu.org> --- > I don't have ifort installed at the moment. Would someone post the output from > ifort with teste0es0en0.f90 attached to this PR? Much appreciated. > > -- > You are receiving this mail because: > You reported the bug. > -- John Harper, School of Mathematics and Statistics Victoria Univ. of Wellington, PO Box 600, Wellington 6140, New Zealand. e-mail john.har...@vuw.ac.nz
