https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110349
--- Comment #6 from Jason Merrill <jason at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
(In reply to Jakub Jelinek from comment #4)
> "A member shall not be declared twice in the member-specification, except
> that"
> and nothing mentioning the name-independent exception in either case.
Agreed, this seems like a missed edit, and we should accept those.
> Seems clang rejects the baz case with ++_; added after 1; (and the WIP patch
> does too), but doesn't reject ++_; added after 3; (while the WIP patch does).
I agree that these should be rejected and the wording needs improvement to
specify that.
(In reply to Jakub Jelinek from comment #5)
> Also, is the structured binding in
> void corge ()
> {
> static int a[2];
> static auto [_, _] = a;
> }
> inhabitating namespace scope (so it is correct to reject it? clang does,
> the WIP patch does as well).
No, it inhabits block/function scope.
