[Bug middle-end/111009] [12/13/14 regression] -fno-strict-overflow erroneously elides null pointer checks and causes SIGSEGV on perf from linux-6.4.10

[cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs]

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111009

--- Comment #11 from CVS Commits <cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
The master branch has been updated by Andrew Macleod <amacl...@gcc.gnu.org>:

https://gcc.gnu.org/g:dc48d1d1d4458773f89f21b2f019f66ddf88f2e5

commit r14-3296-gdc48d1d1d4458773f89f21b2f019f66ddf88f2e5
Author: Andrew MacLeod <amacl...@redhat.com>
Date:   Thu Aug 17 11:13:14 2023 -0400

    Fix range-ops operator_addr.

    Lack of symbolic information prevents op1_range from beig able to draw
    the same conclusions as fold_range can.

            PR tree-optimization/111009
            gcc/
            * range-op.cc (operator_addr_expr::op1_range): Be more restrictive.

            gcc/testsuite/
            * gcc.dg/pr111009.c: New.