https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110740
Kewen Lin <linkw at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Attachment #55587|0 |1
is obsolete| |
--- Comment #5 from Kewen Lin <linkw at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
Created attachment 55590
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=55590&action=edit
patchv2
(In reply to Richard Biener from comment #4)
> Hmm, shouldn't this also apply to the main loop?
Good question! I think it can. I've updated it to make it not epilogue only.
> I suppose we just never
> get such a case, but maybe with peeling for gaps we would? Eventually we'd
> hope
> we never would cost it as profitable.
Yeah, it forces this assumption.
