https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109712
--- Comment #21 from Thomas Neumann <tneumann at users dot sourceforge.net> --- It must be something more complex. value is small here (more precisely: 1888 in the crashes later), which is not a valid pointer address. We probably have to add this to some base pointer? But it is not obvious to me to which one.
