https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110061
Wilco <wilco at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Last reconfirmed| |2023-05-31
See Also| |https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzill
| |a/show_bug.cgi?id=80878
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |wilco at gcc dot gnu.org
Status|RESOLVED |NEW
Resolution|DUPLICATE |---
Ever confirmed|0 |1
--- Comment #4 from Wilco <wilco at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
Reopened. Please don't close bugs without allowing for discussion first. I'll
send a patch soon that shows it's possible and valid.
And if there is a better solution that results in the same benefits (fast
lock-free atomics, allowing inlining and use of latest instructions without ABI
issues) then I would love to hear ideas and suggestions.
