https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109880

Peter Bergner <bergner at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
   Target Milestone|---                         |14.0
     Ever confirmed|0                           |1
           Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org      |aagarwa at gcc dot 
gnu.org
   Last reconfirmed|                            |2023-05-17
             Status|UNCONFIRMED                 |ASSIGNED

--- Comment #1 from Peter Bergner <bergner at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
Confirmed.  The difference I see is:

gcc.target/powerpc/fold-vec-extract-int.p8.c: \\mrldicl\\M found 5 times
FAIL: gcc.target/powerpc/fold-vec-extract-int.p8.c scan-assembler-times
\\mrldicl\\M 7

...which makes sense, since the rldicl is used as a zero extend, so it does
look like just an instruction count update is needed.

Ajit, can you please confirm the 2 missing rldicl were removed because of zero
extends?  Bill's build seems pretty normal, so did you not see this failure
during your testing?

Reply via email to