https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109641

--- Comment #9 from Steve Kargl <sgk at troutmask dot apl.washington.edu> ---
On Fri, Apr 28, 2023 at 01:37:48AM +0000, adelson.oliveira at gmail dot com
wrote:
> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109641
> 
> --- Comment #8 from Adelson Oliveira <adelson.oliveira at gmail dot com> ---
> Then I should have defined the operations with double precision as well?
> 

I have tested, but mostly yes.  If I do a -fdump-parse-tree
of your code, I see

  code:
  ASSIGN teste:v(FULL) 1.00000000e0
  ASSIGN teste:m(FULL) (complex 1.00000000e0 1.00000000e0)
  ASSIGN teste:r(FULL) (* __convert_r4_c4[[((teste:v(FULL)))]] teste:m(FULL))

If you have mixed REAL and DOUBLE PRECISION, you'll likely
have an implicit __convert_r4_r8.

Reply via email to