https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109632
--- Comment #6 from Tamar Christina <tnfchris at gcc dot gnu.org> --- That's an interesting approach, I think it would also fix https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109391 would it not? Since the int16x8x3_t return would be "scalarized" avoiding the bad expansion?
