https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109442
--- Comment #11 from Jonathan Wakely <redi at gcc dot gnu.org> --- (In reply to Jonathan Wakely from comment #10) > I would prefer if we don't deviate, and get Clang to clarify things instead > of reinventing something that looks similar but isn't. I suppose as long as the common subset of semantics that the library cares about works the same way, it's OK. It would be bad if the library needs to use extra checks beyond __has_builtin to discover which "flavour" of __builtin_operator_new is present.
