https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109339
Jakub Jelinek <jakub at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #8 from Jakub Jelinek <jakub at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
What is the
explicit
_Stop_state_ref(const stop_source&)
: _M_ptr(new _Stop_state_t())
{ }
there for, can't you use some completely unrelated type there instead (bool,
stop_source*, some enum, whatever), or drop the const at least?
The passing pointer to uninitialized const object or reference to uninitialized
const object to function we don't know anything about is I think one of the
design goals of Martin's change which probably not everybody will agree with,
but it is true that it can sometimes find bugs in code.
