https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109223

--- Comment #3 from kargl at gcc dot gnu.org ---
(In reply to kargl from comment #2)
> Why do you think it should work?
> 
> R863 implicit-stmt       is IMPLICIT implicit-spec-list
>                          or IMPLICIT NONE [ ( [ implicit-none-spec-list ] ) ]
> 
> R864 implicit-spec       is declaration-type-spec ( letter-spec-list )
> 
> R865 letter-spec         is letter [-­ letter ]
> 
> R866 implicit-none-spec  is EXTERNAL
>                          or TYPE
> 
> My reading of the EBNF is that TYPE can only following NONE.
> Your code lacks NONE.

Replying to self.  In fact, the syntax requires (TYPE) not TYPE.
More importantly TYPE does not take a declaration-type-spec.

Reply via email to