[Bug c++/109030] [13 Regression] checking ICE in cxx_eval_call_expression with aggregate initialization inside noexcept

[cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs]

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109030

--- Comment #3 from CVS Commits <cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
The trunk branch has been updated by Marek Polacek <mpola...@gcc.gnu.org>:

https://gcc.gnu.org/g:e4692319fd5fc7d740436e8bb338f44cb8df6c58

commit r13-6526-ge4692319fd5fc7d740436e8bb338f44cb8df6c58
Author: Marek Polacek <pola...@redhat.com>
Date:   Mon Mar 6 18:06:39 2023 -0500

    c++: noexcept and copy elision [PR109030]

    When processing a noexcept, constructors aren't elided: build_over_call
    has
             /* It's unsafe to elide the constructor when handling
                a noexcept-expression, it may evaluate to the wrong
                value (c++/53025).  */
             && (force_elide || cp_noexcept_operand == 0))
    so the assert I added recently needs to be relaxed a little bit.

            PR c++/109030

    gcc/cp/ChangeLog:

            * constexpr.cc (cxx_eval_call_expression): Relax assert.

    gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog:

            * g++.dg/cpp0x/noexcept77.C: New test.