https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108879
David Malcolm <dmalcolm at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Blocks| |97110
--- Comment #1 from David Malcolm <dmalcolm at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
Yeah, I haven't implemented exceptions yet, so even the simplest cases are
likely to fail :-/
I plan to spent a chunk of my GCC *14* cycles working on C++ support (in the
hope of "eating my own dogfood" for GCC 14), but in the meantime, I'm afraid
it's not going to be helpful to file any more bugs about -fanalyzer on C++.
I've added a caveat about that to the GCC 13 release notes:
https://gcc.gnu.org/git/?p=gcc-wwwdocs.git;a=commitdiff;h=98c77c7cd4fc3f1bb1e77e260640cbbe5fd45b46
and to the manpage/docs:
https://gcc.gnu.org/git/?p=gcc.git;a=commitdiff;h=a90316c6ceddfbb47b3c2161baf446ccb87df5ff
Referenced Bugs:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97110
[Bug 97110] [meta-bug] tracker bug for supporting C++ in -fanalyzer
