https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108747
Andrew Pinski <pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Resolution|--- |INVALID
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Version|og11 (devel/omp/gcc-11) |13.0
--- Comment #1 from Andrew Pinski <pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
> and eax, 7
What are you asking about? Why GCC decided to still use %8 here (and do &7)
even with the static_cast?
The reasoning is because constexpr causes a const integer expression here so
the front-end will do the replacement.
There is nothing to fix here really because the user asked the compiler to do
the casting away the const via const_cast and everything.
