https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108715
--- Comment #15 from Andrew Pinski <pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org> --- (In reply to Jakub Jelinek from comment #14) > It isn't really a dup, that other PR is about strlen pattern in some > function with a different name. PR 103858 was also marked as a dup much earlier. I think the original code in valgrind (which PR 102725 is about) used strlen as the name of the function and the reporter change the name just to show what was happening ...
