https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108705
--- Comment #1 from Rimvydas (RJ) <rimvydas.jas at gmail dot com> --- Using assumed shape arrays "p(:),s(:)" in bar() requires longer chain of calls to foo() and all time spent moves to "tree VRP", but produced assembly is more cluttered than with assumed size array declarations. Original code trips on both variants in different ltrans partitions during LTO link.
