https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108544
--- Comment #2 from anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org --- I played a little and found a variation of testcase pr96102.f90 that was silently accepted but is rejected by Intel, NAG, Cray, NVidia: module m type mytype integer :: i end type type(mytype) :: d = mytype (42) ! { dg-error "is host associated" } integer :: n = 2 ! { dg-error "is host associated" } contains subroutine s if ( n /= 0 ) stop 1 ! { dg-error "internal procedure of the same name" } if ( d%i /= 0 ) stop 2 ! { dg-error "internal procedure of the same name" } contains subroutine n() end subroutine d() end end end This need removing just one line of code in addition to comment#1: diff --git a/gcc/fortran/resolve.cc b/gcc/fortran/resolve.cc index 94213cd3cd4..b40e04513b5 100644 --- a/gcc/fortran/resolve.cc +++ b/gcc/fortran/resolve.cc @@ -6087,7 +6093,6 @@ check_host_association (gfc_expr *e) gfc_find_symbol (e->symtree->name, gfc_current_ns, 1, &sym); if (sym && old_sym != sym - && sym->ts.type == old_sym->ts.type && sym->attr.flavor == FL_PROCEDURE && sym->attr.contained) { @@ -6132,6 +6137,9 @@ check_host_association (gfc_expr *e) return false; } + if (ref == NULL) + return false; + gcc_assert (ref->type == REF_ARRAY); /* Grab the start expressions from the array ref and Am I missing something?