https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90128
Martin Jambor <jamborm at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|ASSIGNED |RESOLVED
Resolution|--- |FIXED
--- Comment #11 from Martin Jambor <jamborm at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
(In reply to Martin Jambor from comment #10)
> We still regress, according to LNT 8% on zen2:
> https://lnt.opensuse.org/db_default/v4/SPEC/graph?plot.0=335.437.0&plot.
> 1=309.437.0&plot.2=346.437.0&plot.3=276.437.0&plot.4=398.437.0&plot.5=417.
> 437.0&plot.6=295.437.0&
>
> and 12% on zen3:
> https://lnt.opensuse.org/db_default/v4/SPEC/graph?plot.0=554.437.0&plot.
> 1=539.437.0&plot.2=562.437.0&plot.3=493.437.0&plot.4=520.437.0&plot.5=508.
> 437.0&plot.6=471.437.0&
> (versions we regress against are represented by dots)
>
> and 9.40% against zen1:
> https://lnt.opensuse.org/db_default/v4/SPEC/graph?plot.0=148.437.0&plot.1=59.
> 437.0&plot.2=76.437.0&plot.3=260.437.0&plot.4=361.437.0&plot.5=454.437.
> 0&plot.6=33.437.0&
>
> However, while my independent measurements confirmed the zen2 regression, I
> dod not see the zen3 regression (I have not independently benchmarked zen1).
According to the first two links above (LNT no longer has a zen1 machine), the
problem has been fixed over the GCC 13 development cycle.
