https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107976
Richard Biener <rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |marxin at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #2 from Richard Biener <rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
(In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #1)
> ncases = tree_to_shwi (range) + 1;
> labelvec = XALLOCAVEC (rtx, ncases);
> memset (labelvec, 0, ncases * sizeof (rtx));
>
>
> I think this is a won't fix.
> Doctor, it hurts when I bend my arm this way.
> Don't bend it that way then.
Changing the above to heap allocation would be easy - of course we'd generate
a huge number of labels then which eventually will lead to different issues.
Using heap allocation or an auto_vec and capping the maximum of
jump-table-max-growth-ratio-for-{size,speed} to something sensible
(the defaults are 300 and 800) would be appropriate I think.
