[Bug c++/107953] Greater-than operator misparsed inside a lambda expression used as a template argument

[majerech.o at gmail dot com via Gcc-bugs]

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107953

--- Comment #4 from Ondřej Majerech <majerech.o at gmail dot com> ---
It seems that the core of PR 57 is that `A<T` could syntactically be a valid
expression, and it would require a look-up to determine that A and T are in
fact a template and a type, and not values.

Here, however, the fragment `[] (int x, int y) { return x` doesn't form a
syntactically valid expression. So, to me at least, it seems there should be no
ambiguity.