https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107836
Andreas Schwab <sch...@linux-m68k.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Resolution|--- |INVALID
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
--- Comment #2 from Andreas Schwab <sch...@linux-m68k.org> ---
There is no dependency whatsoever between the asm statements, thus they can be
moved around freely. Especially the third one is producing a constant output as
seen by the compiler, thus moving it to the top of the function is perfectly
valid.
