https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107444
anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Keywords| |wrong-code
--- Comment #2 from anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org ---
OK, here's a better example of the weird situation:
program p
call s()
call s(i=7)
call s(c='a')
call s(r=3.0)
contains
subroutine s (i,c,r)
integer , value, optional :: i
character, value, optional :: c
real , value, optional :: r
print *, "present (i), present (r) =", present (i), present (r)
end subroutine s
end
With 12-branch this prints:
present (i), present (r) = F F
present (i), present (r) = T F
present (i), present (r) = F F ! right but for the wrong reason...
present (i), present (r) = F F ! should be F T
With 13-mainline + patch under review for pr107441(v2) I get:
present (i), present (r) = F F
present (i), present (r) = T F
present (i), present (r) = F T ! should be F F
present (i), present (r) = F T ! right but for the wrong reason...
So not a regression... ;-)
