https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107463
Andrew Pinski <pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
See Also| |https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzill
| |a/show_bug.cgi?id=90475
Last reconfirmed| |2022-10-30
Ever confirmed|0 |1
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
--- Comment #1 from Andrew Pinski <pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
Confirmed, related to PR 90475.
Note clang in this case is just as bad as GCC (unlike PR 90475):
<source>:9:7: error: no matching constructor for initialization of 'S'
S s({
^ ~
<source>:1:8: note: candidate constructor (the implicit copy constructor) not
viable: cannot convert initializer list argument to 'const S'
struct S {
^
<source>:1:8: note: candidate constructor (the implicit move constructor) not
viable: cannot convert initializer list argument to 'S'
struct S {
^
<source>:5:5: note: candidate constructor not viable: cannot convert
initializer list argument to 'const Config'
S(Config const & cfg);
^
