https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107189
François Dumont <fdumont at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Last reconfirmed| |2022-10-12
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |fdumont at gcc dot
gnu.org
Ever confirmed|0 |1
CC| |fdumont at gcc dot gnu.org
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
--- Comment #1 from François Dumont <fdumont at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
Code looks perfectly consistent to me. There is just this _Alloc_node
instantiation to remove.
Why do you want to call the _M_emplace_hint_{unique,equal} ? I rather wondered
why the __is_same_value_type alternatives are doing so just to pass end() as a
hint. And the answer is just that it is more convenient. Look at the
_M_insert_unique overloads to see that the one called is the most convenient
one.
Thanks for the report.
