https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106832
--- Comment #25 from Iain Buclaw <ibuclaw at gdcproject dot org> --- (In reply to Iain Buclaw from comment #24) > I'd imagine all static asserts would be hit, so a lot more than that - > floor, tan, sin, cos, pow, etc... - some of which are not exactly trivial to > implement for the IBM format (I've looked at it on a couple occasions over > the last decade). Some could be helped along by just returning the result of libm functions instead of implementing them inline, but then the C function declarations would need the same attributes as std.math - notably many libm bindings in the core.stdc.math module are not annotated with `pure`.
