https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106878

--- Comment #6 from Jakub Jelinek <jakub at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
Created attachment 53552
  --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=53552&action=edit
gcc13-pr106878-3.patch

Or we can revert parts of Andrew's change and allow BIT_NOT_EXPR on pointers
and OFFSET_TYPE, because it is just weird if the 3 BIT_*_EXPR are inconsitent
with it.
Except this ICEs in the ranger, which wants to treat BIT_NOT_EXPR as
~X is simply -1 - X except that MINUS_EXPR isn't supported on pointers.

Reply via email to