https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106785
Aldy Hernandez <aldyh at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #4 from Aldy Hernandez <aldyh at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
For !HONOR_NANS we know x >= 5.0 will not contain a NAN, but what about
explicit NANs in the code, for example the result of __builtin_nan?
Is [NAN, NAN] != [NAN, NAN] like we do for HONOR_NANS?
Are the following selftests applicable for !HONOR_NANS?
// NAN U NAN = NAN
// NAN ^ NAN = NAN
// VARYING ^ NAN = NAN.
It would seem yes, but I'd like to make sure.
