https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106535
Jonathan Wakely <redi at gcc dot gnu.org> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Keywords| |diagnostic Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Ever confirmed|0 |1 Last reconfirmed| |2022-08-05 --- Comment #2 from Jonathan Wakely <redi at gcc dot gnu.org> --- Looks like this comment is not correct: /* Compound expressions can only occur here if -Wpedantic or -pedantic-errors is specified. In the later case, we always want an error. In the former case, we simply want a warning. */ if (require_constant && pedantic && TREE_CODE (inside_init) == COMPOUND_EXPR) { inside_init = valid_compound_expr_initializer (inside_init, TREE_TYPE (inside_init)); if (inside_init == error_mark_node) error_init (init_loc, "initializer element is not constant"); else pedwarn_init (init_loc, OPT_Wpedantic, "initializer element is not constant"); if (flag_pedantic_errors) inside_init = error_mark_node; } else if (require_constant && !initializer_constant_valid_p (inside_init, TREE_TYPE (inside_init))) { error_init (init_loc, "initializer element is not constant"); inside_init = error_mark_node; } else if (require_constant && !maybe_const) pedwarn_init (init_loc, OPT_Wpedantic, "initializer element is not a constant expression"); Without -pedantic the first condition is false, so it takes the second branch which uses error_init. With -pedantic the first branch is taken, and it uses pedwarn_init which is only a warning unless you use -pedantic-errors.