https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100157
--- Comment #8 from Jonathan Wakely <redi at gcc dot gnu.org> --- (In reply to Vittorio Romeo from comment #6) > worthwhile to keep the same name as Clang for compatibility, No, that's not an option. Clang's is a built-in template, GCC's can't be (it would require considerable internal reworking to support that). That's also why we have __integer_pack(N)... instead of __make_integer_seq<>. Since GCC's built-in has to use different syntax, it would be a disaster to use the same name. #if __has_builtin(__type_pack_element) // now what? is it a template or a function? #endif
