https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106138
Jakub Jelinek <jakub at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #2 from Jakub Jelinek <jakub at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
I'd say reassoc would be a better place to handle it, so that we handle both
the logical op short circuit && and x == 4 && y == 25 && z != 16 && (x & 3) !=
0.
