https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105930
--- Comment #4 from Linus Torvalds <torva...@linux-foundation.org> ---
So hey, since you guys use git now, I thought I might as well just bisect this.
Now, I have no idea what the best and most efficient way is to generate only
"cc1", so my bisection run was this unholy mess of "just run configure, and
then run 'make -j128' for long enough that 'host-x86_64-pc-linux-gnu/gcc/cc1'
gets generated, and test that".
I'm not proud of that hacky thing, but since gcc documentation is written in
sanskrit, and mere mortals can't figure it out, it's the best I could do.
And the problem bisects down to
8ea4a34bd0b0a46277b5e077c89cbd86dfb09c48 is the first bad commit
commit 8ea4a34bd0b0a46277b5e077c89cbd86dfb09c48
Author: Roger Sayle <ro...@nextmovesoftware.com>
Date: Sat Mar 5 08:50:45 2022 +0000
PR 104732: Simplify/fix DI mode logic expansion/splitting on -m32.
so yes, this seems to be very much specific to the i386 target.
And yes, I also verified that reverting that commit on the current master
branch solves it for me.
Again: this was just a completely mindless bisection, with a "revert to verify"
on top of the current trunk, which for me happened to be commit cd02f15f1ae
("xtensa: Improve constant synthesis for both integer and floating-point").
I'm attaching the revert patch I used just so that you can see exactly what I
did. I probably shouldn't have actually removed the testsuite entry, but again:
ENTIRELY MINDLESS BISECTION RESULT.
