https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105875
Bug ID: 105875 Summary: Toggling an atomic_bool is inefficient Product: gcc Version: 12.1.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Keywords: missed-optimization Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: c Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org Reporter: josephcsible at gmail dot com Target Milestone: --- Target: x86_64-pc-linux-gnu Consider this C code: #include <stdatomic.h> atomic_bool b; atomic_char c; _Bool b2; void f1(void) { b ^= 1; } void f2(void) { c ^= 1; } void f3(void) { b2 ^= 1; } At -O3, those functions compile into this: f1: movzbl b(%rip), %eax .L5: movb %al, -1(%rsp) xorl $1, %eax movl %eax, %edx movzbl -1(%rsp), %eax lock cmpxchgb %dl, b(%rip) jne .L5 ret f2: lock xorb $1, c(%rip) ret f3: xorb $1, b2(%rip) ret The code generated for f1 is inefficient. It should have just done a "lock xorb $1, b(%rip)".