https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105256
--- Comment #36 from CVS Commits <cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org> --- The releases/gcc-9 branch has been updated by Jakub Jelinek <ja...@gcc.gnu.org>: https://gcc.gnu.org/g:30895a25ea94e0ba47f97803137f2a0a42af848c commit r9-10150-g30895a25ea94e0ba47f97803137f2a0a42af848c Author: Jakub Jelinek <ja...@redhat.com> Date: Tue Apr 19 18:27:41 2022 +0200 c++: Fix up CONSTRUCTOR_PLACEHOLDER_BOUNDARY handling [PR105256] The CONSTRUCTOR_PLACEHOLDER_BOUNDARY bit is supposed to separate PLACEHOLDER_EXPRs that should be replaced by one object or subobjects of it (variable, TARGET_EXPR slot, ...) from other PLACEHOLDER_EXPRs that should be replaced by different objects or subobjects. The bit is set when finding PLACEHOLDER_EXPRs inside of a CONSTRUCTOR, not looking into nested CONSTRUCTOR_PLACEHOLDER_BOUNDARY ctors, and we prevent elision of TARGET_EXPRs (through TARGET_EXPR_NO_ELIDE) whose initializer is a CONSTRUCTOR_PLACEHOLDER_BOUNDARY ctor. The following testcase ICEs though, we don't replace the placeholders in there at all, because CONSTRUCTOR_PLACEHOLDER_BOUNDARY isn't set on the TARGET_EXPR_INITIAL ctor, but on a ctor nested in such a ctor. replace_placeholders should be run on the whole TARGET_EXPR slot. So, the following patch fixes it by moving the CONSTRUCTOR_PLACEHOLDER_BOUNDARY bit from nested CONSTRUCTORs to the CONSTRUCTOR containing those (but only if it is closely nested, if there is some other tree sandwiched in between, it doesn't do it). 2022-04-19 Jakub Jelinek <ja...@redhat.com> PR c++/105256 * typeck2.c (process_init_constructor_array, process_init_constructor_record, process_init_constructor_union): Move CONSTRUCTOR_PLACEHOLDER_BOUNDARY flag from CONSTRUCTOR elements to the containing CONSTRUCTOR. * g++.dg/cpp0x/pr105256.C: New test. (cherry picked from commit eb03e424598d30fed68801af6d6ef6236d32e32e)
