https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105353
--- Comment #6 from Marek Polacek <mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org> --- Good point, I suppose this is better: --- a/gcc/cp/typeck.cc +++ b/gcc/cp/typeck.cc @@ -6315,7 +6315,9 @@ build_x_shufflevector (location_t loc, vec<tree, va_gc> *args, if (processing_template_decl) { for (unsigned i = 0; i < args->length (); ++i) - if (type_dependent_expression_p ((*args)[i])) + if (i <= 1 + ? type_dependent_expression_p ((*args)[i]) + : instantiation_dependent_expression_p ((*args)[i])) { tree exp = build_min_nt_call_vec (NULL, args); CALL_EXPR_IFN (exp) = IFN_SHUFFLEVECTOR;