https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105187

--- Comment #2 from Marek Polacek <mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
We're tripping on this assert

+  /* A COMPOUND_LITERAL_P CONSTRUCTOR is the syntactic form; by the time we
get
+     here it should have been digested into an actual value for the type.  */
+  gcc_checking_assert (TREE_CODE (value) != CONSTRUCTOR
+                      || processing_template_decl
+                      || !TREE_HAS_CONSTRUCTOR (value));

(gdb) p value
$1 = <constructor 0x7fffea4bfb70>
(gdb) pge
{1.0e+0 / 0.0 - 1.0e+0 / 0.0, 1.0e+0 / 0.0 - 1.0e+0 / 0.0}

Reply via email to