https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105171

--- Comment #9 from PaX Team <pageexec at gmail dot com> ---
(In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #7)
> I think there might be a way to check if the option -frandom-seed was passed
> and that might be a better option for your usage anyways. You should check
> the options handling code.
i had checked it before but the trace that -frandom-seed/set_random_seed()
leave behind is a static variable (flag_random_seed), local_tick would be an
indirect indicator were it not for this bug. the only other way i can see is
the rather big hammer of having to reparse common_deferred_options or
save_decoded_options as mentioned by Jakub (both are gcc 4.6+ only)...

Reply via email to