https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103460
Andrew Pinski <pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Last reconfirmed| |2022-03-07
Ever confirmed|0 |1
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
--- Comment #1 from Andrew Pinski <pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
Confirmed.
P2128R6 says:
We propose that operator[] should be able to accept zero or more arguments,
including variadic arguments.
Interesting how clang also rejects this.
Simplified testcase to understand the issue:
struct S {
void operator[](int,...);
};
--- CUT ----
"auto[]..." is the same as "auto[],...." really.
As far as I read the paper, it is clear this should be accepted unless I really
miss something.
