https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104529
--- Comment #7 from Tamar Christina <tnfchris at gcc dot gnu.org> --- (In reply to Jakub Jelinek from comment #6) > I don't see the code mentioned in #c0 on x86_64, I see also loads and stores > like on aarch64. Yes, that was my mistake, I was accidentally comparing GCC 11 x86_64 with GCC 12 AArch64. That's how I noticed it was an 12 regression later. Should have clarified.
