https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101908
--- Comment #24 from cuilili <lili.cui at intel dot com> --- (In reply to cuilili from comment #23) > (In reply to Richard Biener from comment #17) > > I do wonder though how CLX is fine with such access pattern ;) (did you > > test > > with just -O2?) > Sorry, correct w/ and w/t order. Actually CLX also has STLF issues, there is 13.7% regression when comparing "gcc trunk + -O2" w/t and w/ "-fno-tree-vectorize"