https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104220

Tobias Burnus <burnus at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
         Resolution|---                         |FIXED
             Status|NEW                         |RESOLVED

--- Comment #6 from Tobias Burnus <burnus at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
(In reply to Francois-Xavier Coudert from comment #5)
> Is this a "double double" long double? If so, is it fixed by the patch at
> https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/fortran/2022-January/057454.html ?

Yes, Jakub's patch does help, i.e. it is fixed by:
  commit 480caa1f4ab1f138435239d67ffe3126c5e27b2b
  "libfortran: Provide fallback __issignalingl for IBM extended long double"

-> close as FIXED.


The only ieee/ testcase that still fails is gfortran.dg/ieee/large_2.f90, but
that
FAIL is not new -> PR67531

Reply via email to