https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104220
Tobias Burnus <burnus at gcc dot gnu.org> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Resolution|--- |FIXED Status|NEW |RESOLVED --- Comment #6 from Tobias Burnus <burnus at gcc dot gnu.org> --- (In reply to Francois-Xavier Coudert from comment #5) > Is this a "double double" long double? If so, is it fixed by the patch at > https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/fortran/2022-January/057454.html ? Yes, Jakub's patch does help, i.e. it is fixed by: commit 480caa1f4ab1f138435239d67ffe3126c5e27b2b "libfortran: Provide fallback __issignalingl for IBM extended long double" -> close as FIXED. The only ieee/ testcase that still fails is gfortran.dg/ieee/large_2.f90, but that FAIL is not new -> PR67531