https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103598
Jason Merrill <jason at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|NEW |UNCONFIRMED
Ever confirmed|1 |0
--- Comment #4 from Jason Merrill <jason at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
(In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #2)
> (In reply to Martin Liška from comment #1)
> > Confirmed, started with r12-5783-gf78eaffd1538efb4.
>
> Hmm, actually it makes sense to some extend since llvm::getTypeName is in
> the llvm namespace printing llvm:: here is kinda of pointless really.
Exactly, this was the intent of the change. Though I suppose it's debatable
whether the template bindings should be affected by it, since they aren't C++
syntax and so not clearly in the declarator scope.
But we don't make any guarantees about the stability of __PRETTY_FUNCTION__,
and it is affected by -fno-pretty-templates. And it looks like clang leaves
out the "with", so it's unequal either way.
