https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104015
--- Comment #9 from Kewen Lin <linkw at gcc dot gnu.org> --- (In reply to rsand...@gcc.gnu.org from comment #6) > I think the patch in comment 2 is the correct fix (OK to commit). > Thanks for the review and approval Richard! I totally agree this test case can be fragile when facing different vectorisation strategies, but I'm not sure if leaving the exact number checkings still has a bit value since this case seems the only case to catch the redundant re-try (at least on Power?), once we fix it not to check any times, we might miss some sensitive coverage on some useless re-tries, though the compiling time influence is very very tiny (seems not a big deal :)).
