https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100129
--- Comment #3 from Andrew Pinski <pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org> --- Add --param=ggc-min-expand=1 we get: hash table checking failed: equal operator returns true for a pair of values with a different hash value In file included from /home/apinski/upstream-gcc/include/c++/12.0.0/future:44: /home/apinski/upstream-gcc/include/c++/12.0.0/bits/atomic_futex.h:76:5: internal compiler error: in hashtab_chk_error, at hash-table.c:137 76 | atomic<unsigned> _M_data; | ^~~~~~ 0x9bab97 hashtab_chk_error() /home/apinski/src/upstream-gcc/gcc/gcc/hash-table.c:137 0xbd7e85 hash_table<spec_hasher, false, xcallocator>::verify(spec_entry* const&, unsigned int) /home/apinski/src/upstream-gcc/gcc/gcc/hash-table.h:1036 0xbd840c hash_table<spec_hasher, false, xcallocator>::find_slot_with_hash(spec_entry* const&, unsigned int, insert_option) /home/apinski/src/upstream-gcc/gcc/gcc/hash-table.h:971 0xb93d0b match_mergeable_specialization(bool, spec_entry*) /home/apinski/src/upstream-gcc/gcc/gcc/cp/pt.c:30400 0xb0531c trees_in::key_mergeable(int, merge_kind, tree_node*, tree_node*, tree_node*, tree_node*, bool) /home/apinski/src/upstream-gcc/gcc/gcc/cp/module.cc:10683 0xb0925e trees_in::decl_value() /home/apinski/src/upstream-gcc/gcc/gcc/cp/module.cc:7911 0xb02147 trees_in::tree_node(bool) /home/apinski/src/upstream-gcc/gcc/gcc/cp/module.cc:9164 0xb0864b module_state::read_cluster(unsigned int) /home/apinski/src/upstream-gcc/gcc/gcc/cp/module.cc:14830 0xb08be5 module_state::load_section(unsigned int, binding_slot*) /home/apinski/src/upstream-gcc/gcc/gcc/cp/module.cc:18101 0xb08d9e lazy_load_binding(unsigned int, tree_node*, tree_node*, binding_slot*) /home/apinski/src/upstream-gcc/gcc/gcc/cp/module.cc:18792 0xb1abed name_lookup::search_namespace_only(tree_node*) /home/apinski/src/upstream-gcc/gcc/gcc/cp/name-lookup.c:927 0xb1c0f3 name_lookup::search_unqualified(tree_node*, cp_binding_level*) /home/apinski/src/upstream-gcc/gcc/gcc/cp/name-lookup.c:1157 0xb1de2d lookup_name(tree_node*, LOOK_where, LOOK_want) /home/apinski/src/upstream-gcc/gcc/gcc/cp/name-lookup.c:7739 0xb2f229 lookup_name(tree_node*, LOOK_want) /home/apinski/src/upstream-gcc/gcc/gcc/cp/name-lookup.h:401 0xb2f229 cp_parser_lookup_name /home/apinski/src/upstream-gcc/gcc/gcc/cp/parser.c:30528 0xb5adf8 cp_parser_template_name /home/apinski/src/upstream-gcc/gcc/gcc/cp/parser.c:18539 0xb5b409 cp_parser_template_id /home/apinski/src/upstream-gcc/gcc/gcc/cp/parser.c:18143 0xb5bd6b cp_parser_class_name /home/apinski/src/upstream-gcc/gcc/gcc/cp/parser.c:25640 0xb5271e cp_parser_qualifying_entity /home/apinski/src/upstream-gcc/gcc/gcc/cp/parser.c:7061 0xb5271e cp_parser_nested_name_specifier_opt /home/apinski/src/upstream-gcc/gcc/gcc/cp/parser.c:6743 Please submit a full bug report, with preprocessed source if appropriate. Please include the complete backtrace with any bug report. I am going to assume this is the same bug when I reducing it but if it is not then I will deal with it later.