https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67413
Andrew Pinski <pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Severity|normal |enhancement
Blocks| |101926
--- Comment #3 from Andrew Pinski <pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
Maybe for:
_1 = REALPART_EXPR <i_5(D)>;
_2 = (long long unsigned intD.23) _1;
_3 = IMAGPART_EXPR <i_5(D)>;
_4 = (long long unsigned intD.23) _3;
_6 = COMPLEX_EXPR <_2, _4>;
We should just create a VCE, I don't know if that is a good idea or not,
complex int in cases like this are not used that much anyways so ....
Referenced Bugs:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101926
[Bug 101926] [meta-bug] struct/complex argument passing and return should be
improved
