https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103502
Andrew Pinski <pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Resolution|--- |INVALID
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
--- Comment #1 from Andrew Pinski <pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
The documentation
(https://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/gcc/Warning-Options.html#Warning-Options) for
the warning is clear here:
"Takes care of the common pun+dereference pattern in the front end:
*(int*)&some_float. "
>3 is documented as the most precise option
I think you misunderstood what precise means in this context really.
"Higher levels correspond to higher accuracy (fewer false positives). "
