https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103464

--- Comment #8 from Martin Liška <marxin at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
(In reply to Zhendong Su from comment #6)
> (In reply to Martin Liška from comment #2)
> > Started with r12-5522-g661c02e54ea72fb5, note that ulimit -s 600 works fine
> > and I'm not fully convinced such a small stack limit should be an issue?
> > 
> > Shouldn't we documented what's expected (required) minimal stack for GCC?
> 
> The original test doesn't need the ulimit, but it was extremely difficult to
> reduce to a reasonable size.

Can you please attach the original test-case?

Reply via email to