https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103464
--- Comment #8 from Martin Liška <marxin at gcc dot gnu.org> --- (In reply to Zhendong Su from comment #6) > (In reply to Martin Liška from comment #2) > > Started with r12-5522-g661c02e54ea72fb5, note that ulimit -s 600 works fine > > and I'm not fully convinced such a small stack limit should be an issue? > > > > Shouldn't we documented what's expected (required) minimal stack for GCC? > > The original test doesn't need the ulimit, but it was extremely difficult to > reduce to a reasonable size. Can you please attach the original test-case?