https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103049
--- Comment #4 from Jakub Jelinek <jakub at gcc dot gnu.org> --- Yeah. If we change the wording, we should change it consistently, and perhaps it would be useful to do that because the current wording suggests only a single pair of -std= options, while we mean that level and anything later (I don't think we have something supported std >= 11 && std <= 17 or similar ATM, just >= version or <= version).
