https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102482
--- Comment #3 from Jonathan Wakely <redi at gcc dot gnu.org> --- And the fabulous manual: > warn about uses of "std::initializer_list" that are likely to result in > dangling pointers This is behaving exactly as documented: > * When a list constructor stores the "begin" pointer from the > "initializer_list" argument, this doesn't extend the lifetime of > the array, so if a class variable is constructed from a temporary > "initializer_list", the pointer is left dangling by the end of the > variable declaration statement.
